Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Neonatal Netw ; 40(3): 183-186, 2021 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1259285

ABSTRACT

COVID-19's first wave created chaos for new NICU families as they struggled to cope with the challenge of a fragile infant along with a pandemic. Safety was paramount due to a lack of understanding around how the virus transmits, but much has been learned since then. The next wave of the virus needs to have a rethink around family separation. World leader organization European Foundation for the Care of Newborn Infants (EFCNI) provides insight into the challenges with the first wave and suggests ideas around rethinking how families interact with their baby in the subsequent waves.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/psychology , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/standards , Intensive Care, Neonatal/psychology , Intensive Care, Neonatal/standards , Mother-Child Relations/psychology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Adult , Family Separation , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Male , SARS-CoV-2
2.
J Perinatol ; 41(5): 988-997, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1182808

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate COVID-19 pandemic preparedness, available resources, and guidelines for neonatal care delivery among neonatal health care providers in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) across all continents. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional, web-based survey administered between May and June, 2020. RESULTS: Of 189 invited participants in 69 LMICs, we received 145 (77%) responses from 58 (84%) countries. The pandemic provides significant challenges to neonatal care, particularly in low-income countries. Respondents noted exacerbations of preexisting shortages in staffing, equipment, and isolation capabilities. In Sub-Saharan Africa, 9/35 (26%) respondents noted increased mortality in non-COVID-19-infected infants. Clinical practices on cord clamping, isolation, and breastfeeding varied widely, often not in line with World Health Organization guidelines. Most respondents noted family access restrictions, and limited shared decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: Many LMICs face an exacerbation of preexisting resource challenges for neonatal care during the pandemic. Variable approaches to care delivery and deviations from guidelines provide opportunities for international collaborative improvement.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Health Resources/supply & distribution , Infant Mortality , Intensive Care, Neonatal/standards , Cross-Sectional Studies , Developing Countries , Guidelines as Topic , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care, Neonatal/organization & administration , Poverty
3.
Neonatology ; 117(5): 641-645, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1059919

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: The novel coronavirus 2019 (SARS-CoV-2) has been well described in adults. Further, the impact on older children and during the perinatal time is becoming better studied. As community spread increases, it is important to recognize that neonates are vulnerable to community spread as well. The impact that community-acquired SARS-CoV-2 has in the neonatal time period is unclear, as this population has unique immunity considerations. OBJECTIVE: To report on a case series of SARS-CoV-2 in neonates through community acquisition in the USA. DESIGN: This is an early retrospective study of patients admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) identified as having SAR-CoV-2 through positive real-time polymerase chain reaction assay of nasopharyngeal swabs. FINDINGS: Three patients who required admission to the NICU between the ages of 17 and 33 days old were identified. All 3 had ill contacts in the home or had been to the pediatrician and presented with mild to moderate symptoms including fever, rhinorrhea, and hypoxia, requiring supplemental oxygen during their hospital stay. One patient was admitted with neutropenia, and the other 2 patients became neutropenic during hospitalization. None of the patients had meningitis or multiorgan failure. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Infants with community-acquired SARS-CoV-2 may require hospitalization due to rule-out sepsis guidelines if found to have fever and/or hypoxia. Caregivers of neonates should exercise recommended guidelines before contact with neonates to limit community spread of SARS-CoV-2 to this potentially vulnerable population, including isolation, particularly as asymptomatic cases become prevalent.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/therapy , COVID-19/transmission , Community-Acquired Infections/diagnosis , Community-Acquired Infections/therapy , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/statistics & numerical data , Intensive Care, Neonatal/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Colorado , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical , Male , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment Outcome
4.
J Perinat Med ; 49(4): 500-505, 2021 May 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1040075

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To find out if the expressed breast milk delivery rate to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) for babies who were hospitalized for any reason other than COVID-19, and exclusive breastfeeding (EB) rates between discharge date and 30th day of life of those babies were affected by COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Babies who were hospitalized before the date first coronavirus case was detected in our country were included as control group (CG). The study group was divided into two groups; study group 1 (SG1): the mothers whose babies were hospitalized in the period when mother were asked not to bring breast milk to NICU, study group 2 (SG2): the mothers whose babies were hospitalized after the date we started to use the informed consent form for feeding options. The breast milk delivery rates to NICU during hospitalization and EB rates between discharge and 30th day of life were compared between groups. RESULTS: Among 154 mother-baby dyads (CG, n=50; SG1, n=46; SG2, n=58), the percentage of breast milk delivery to NICU was 100%, 79% for CG, SG2, respectively (p<0.001). The EB rate between discharge and 30th day of life did not change between groups (CG:90%, SG1:89%, SG2:75.9; p=0.075). CONCLUSIONS: If the mothers are informed about the importance of breast milk, the EB rates are not affected by the COVID-19 pandemic in short term, even if the mothers are obligatorily separated from their babies. The breast milk intake rate of the babies was lowest while our NICU protocol was uncertain, and after we prepared a protocol this rate increased.


Subject(s)
Breast Feeding/trends , COVID-19 , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/trends , Intensive Care, Neonatal/trends , Adult , Breast Feeding/psychology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/psychology , Clinical Protocols , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Promotion , Hospitalization , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/standards , Intensive Care, Neonatal/methods , Intensive Care, Neonatal/standards , Male , Pandemics , Professional-Family Relations , Retrospective Studies , Turkey/epidemiology
5.
Adv Neonatal Care ; 21(3): 205-213, 2021 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1015397

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Family-centered care contributes to improved outcomes for preterm and ill infants. Little is known about the perceptions of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) healthcare professionals regarding the degree to which their NICU practices or values family-centered care. PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to describe attitudes and beliefs of NICU healthcare professionals about family-centered care and to explore professional characteristics that might influence those views. METHODS: Data were derived from the baseline phase of a multicenter quasi-experimental study comparing usual family-centered NICU care with mobile-enhanced family-integrated care. Neonatal intensive care unit healthcare professionals completed the Family-Centered Care Questionnaire-Revised (FCCQ-R), a 45-item measure of 9 core dimensions of Current Practice and Necessary Practice for family-centered care. RESULTS: A total of 382 (43%) NICU healthcare professionals from 6 NICUs completed 1 or more of the FCCQ-R subscales, 83% were registered nurses. Total and subscale scores on the Necessary Practice scale were consistently higher than those on the Current Practice scale for all dimensions of family-centered care (mean: 4.40 [0.46] vs 3.61 [0.53], P < .001). Only years of hospital experience and NICU site were significantly associated with Current Practice and Necessary Practice total scores. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Ongoing assessment of the perceptions of NICU healthcare professionals regarding their current practice and beliefs about what is necessary for the delivery of high-quality family-centered care can inform NICU education, quality improvement, and maintenance of family-centered care during the COVID-19 pandemic. IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH: Further research is needed to identify additional factors that predict family-centered care perceptions and behaviors.


Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/standards , Intensive Care, Neonatal/standards , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Patient-Centered Care/standards , Professional-Family Relations , Attitude of Health Personnel , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Infant, Newborn
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL